A hot topic these days is the fee structure of the various platforms from which financial advice and investment management is delivered. Hedge funds, in particular — with their extremely high cost regimes — have been under intense scrutiny the past couple of years. While boutique firms, such as ours, have, for the most part, been able to fly under mainstream media’s radar, I wonder if that tide hasn’t begun to change.
Case in point, yesterday, CNBC published an article titled Hidden Fees Can Eat Away at Your Retirement Savings. The piece focuses on the cost of advice delivered by advisory firms like ours. Here’s a snippet:
The good news: Never before has it been as cheap as it is now for good professional money management. The days of paying 2.5 percent to 5 percent for money management should be gone. The ability that investors have to find a terrific money manager for a small fee is better than ever.
The bad news: The bad news about fees is that people have no idea of the impact they can have on a portfolio. Non-savvy investors are still paying their financial advisors the 2.5 percent plus fee for doing something that can be done much cheaper. Let me visually show you what we mean by looking at three different portfolios.
- Portfolio 1: This portfolio is a commission-based advisor charging 5 percent. This fee includes the cost of managing money, sales, advertising and other expenses. This is an old-school example that unfortunately most broker-dealers still implement today.
- Portfolio 2: This portfolio is a fee-only advisor charging a flat fee of 3 percent.
- Portfolio 3: This portfolio is a fee-only advisor charging a flat fee of 1.5 percent.
Yesterday’s blog post described how we view our bottom line, in terms of what our clients pay for.